?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Vengeance vs. Forgiveness

I've been reading recent threads on MacLeod, and the question of whether he judges others. My own question, inspired by a vid idea that is eating my brain, has to do with vengeance.

I'm not concerned with MacLeod killing Immortals for being a threat to Mortals right now. I want to look at his response when another person has harmed him or people he cares about. I welcome any form of response and discussion, up to pelting with gummy bears. But I'm going to start the conversation with a simple list of cases in which it seems to me he responded with vengeance, and times he did not.

Vengeance on:
Kanwulf for the death of Ian MacLeod
Earl of Rosemont for the massacres after Culloden
Kern for the death of Little Deer
Xavier for killing Hamza El Kahir

Forgiveness of:
Kage with personal betrayal and the deaths of the nuns and orphans
the Mortal boy who killed Tessa
possibly Methos ("I want him to live!")

a bit of both for:
Haresh Clay for the killing of Graham Ashe

Ideas? Comments?

Comments

killabeez
Jun. 17th, 2006 04:05 pm (UTC)
Interesting. I never really thought of Duncan being particularly scared of Xavier. But yes, I suppose once he hooked up with Horton, he became pretty scary. I still don't think I'd call it vengeance. Xavier never really successfully hurt Duncan or anyone he cared about that much. I mean, he did kill his acquaintance, the one whose wife had the flower shop. But it seemed to me much more about what he would do, not what he had done.

I said Gregor because I think at that particular moment in time, in the stairwell and on the roof, Duncan was really quite angry about Gregor threatening Linda. But overall, you're right, anger was mixed with necessity.

No, David's fiancee wasn't a friend, but you said "when another person has harmed him," and David did try to kill him. I think Duncan was also angry with him for betraying him and disappointing him. But yeah, you're probably right, I wouldn't exactly call it vengeance. However, I do think there was an element of forgiveness in letting him go. He pitied David. His mistake, IMO. If there's one guy Duncan let go that I think he never should have, it's David Keogh. The guy was nuts. And there's no way he wasn't going to hurt someone else, eventually.
killabeez
Jun. 17th, 2006 04:07 pm (UTC)
And now, I'm going to retract what I just said. :D I forgot about Duncan's friend in WWI that Xavier killed with the poison gas. He did seem pretty upset about that. So, okay. Maybe just a little revenge. *g*
gryphonrhi
Jun. 22nd, 2006 08:42 pm (UTC)
If there's one guy Duncan let go that I think he never should have, it's David Keogh. The guy was nuts. And there's no way he wasn't going to hurt someone else, eventually.

Hmm. On that same line, the one woman I think Duncan should never have let go is Annie Devlin, for precisely the same reasons: sooner or later, she's going to hurt someone. ::eyes that:: David Keogh and Annie Devlin... *not* a match made in heaven. Eep!